A judge from China’s Hangzhou Internet Court ruled that Bitcoin is virtual property and is owed the same protections as physical property
by Nathaniel Scott
How did this happen? China has been something of a trend-setter for digital law, starting with the founding of internet courts (courts tasked explicitly with handling online and digital cases). The Hangzhou Internet Court, in particular, is one of three internet courts in the country and had previously ruled that blockchain data is permissible as evidence. This case stems from a dispute between a user of a now-shuttered exchange - the user stored their BTC on the exchange, and lost access to it after the exchange was shut down. While they didn’t win the case, the court did confirm Bitcoin’s status as property.
So what does being property actually mean? The recent ruling allows Bitcoin holders to now benefit from the same protections against theft, fraud, and damages as traditional commodities and property in China. On the other hand, the Chinese legal system is based heavily on Soviet jurisprudence, where the law works in a much more top-down fashion than US and UK common law systems, or even European civil law systems, so a regional court ruling may not change much. Internationally, however, the verdict means almost nothing - China is not usually taken as a source of international law, due to the highly politicized nature of its rulings.
How did the markets react? If traders were enthusiastic about this development, it didn’t show in the price. Volatility has hit a bit of a lull, with prices hovering between $9,500 and $11,000 for the past week, more or less in line with the sideways movement seen recently. Some of this uncertainty may have to do with politics - while China recognized Bitcoin as property, India has indicated it may ban crypto altogether.

Comments